Twelve Days at the Top: How Elon Musk Became History's First Trillionaire and Then Wasn't
It lasted twelve days. On June 12, 2026, when SpaceX began trading on the Nasdaq under the ticker SPCX in the largest initial public offering in the history of human commerce, Elon Musk crossed the threshold that no individual in recorded civilisation had ever crossed: a net worth of one trillion dollars. By June 24, 2026 — twelve days later — the Bloomberg Billionaires Index placed him at $957 billion. Still the wealthiest person on earth by an almost incomprehensible margin. Still richer than the next four wealthiest individuals on the planet combined. Still the owner of history's most consequential private industrial empire. But no longer, for now, a trillionaire. The world's first and only member of a club humanity had never previously had reason to define has, at least temporarily, lost his membership.
The story of how it happened — how $1.32 trillion became $957 billion in under two weeks — is not primarily a story about Elon Musk. It is a story about what happens when the most hyped public offering in financial history collides with the structural realities of a thinly floated stock, a $20 billion bond issuance that spooked investors who had just watched the company raise $75 billion, a broader technology sector selloff, and the arrival of options trading that finally gave short sellers the tools to express their skepticism. Understanding the collapse is as important as understanding the peak, because both tell you something essential about where SpaceX, the stock market, and the era of trillion-dollar valuations actually stand.
The Peak: Twelve Days of History
When SPCX priced at $135 per share and opened at $150 on June 12, the mathematics of Musk's fortune — approximately 42 per cent of SpaceX plus his roughly eleven per cent stake in Tesla plus his positions in Neuralink, The Boring Company, and X — placed him comfortably above $1 trillion for the first time. But the real fireworks came in the first week of trading, as retail and institutional demand collided with an almost absurdly thin public float. Only four to five per cent of SpaceX's total shares were available for public trading at IPO — the rest subject to lockup agreements held by insiders, employees, and pre-IPO investors. In a market structure where enormous demand meets microscopic supply, prices do not rise. They detonate.
By June 16, 2026 — just four trading days after the IPO — SpaceX shares had reached an intraday high of $225.64 per share, a 67 per cent gain from the IPO price in under a week. The company's market capitalisation at that peak exceeded $2.99 trillion, briefly surpassing both Amazon and Microsoft to become the fourth most valuable publicly traded company in the world, behind only Apple, Nvidia, and Alphabet. At that price, Bloomberg's index placed Musk's total net worth at approximately $1.32 trillion — a figure so unprecedented that even the word unprecedented feels inadequate to describe it. The distance between Musk at $1.32 trillion and Larry Page, the second wealthiest person on earth at approximately $297 billion, was at that moment larger than Jeff Bezos's entire fortune.
The Descent: Five Days, $600 Billion Erased
The fall began almost immediately. On June 17, shares retreated from the $225 peak. On June 18, they fell a further five per cent. Then came June 22 — the single most damaging day in SPCX's brief public life.
On Monday, June 22, SpaceX shares fell 16.4 per cent in a single session, closing at $154.60. It was the worst single trading day the stock had seen, and it was not driven by one cause but by a convergence of several that arrived simultaneously and compounded each other.
The most immediately visible catalyst was a Securities and Exchange Commission filing revealed on the same day: SpaceX was preparing to issue at least $20 billion in senior unsecured bonds — its first-ever public debt offering. The filing disclosed the bond issuance and revealed the purpose: refinancing the bridge loan that had been secured earlier in 2026 to fund SpaceX's acquisition of Musk's xAI startup, which closed in February and was valued at approximately $80 billion at the time. Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley were expected to run the deal. The bond news triggered an immediate and rational question in the minds of investors: a company that had just raised $75 billion in the largest IPO in history was now also issuing $20 billion in debt. Was the IPO capital insufficient? Was the cash burn deeper than disclosed? Was the balance sheet position less comfortable than the $100.8 billion cash figure the filing simultaneously revealed?
The answer to those questions, when examined carefully, is more nuanced than the market's initial reaction suggested. SpaceX's $100.8 billion cash position looks substantial in isolation — but that figure includes the $75 billion in IPO proceeds. Strip out the IPO capital and the pre-IPO cash balance was approximately $25 billion. The bond issuance was explicitly described as refinancing rather than new capital raising — converting the short-term bridge loan (which matures fifteen months after the IPO) into longer-term investment-grade debt at more favourable terms. The cash burn concern was real but not new: xAI lost $6.355 billion at the operating line in 2025 and spent $12.7 billion in capital expenditure, entirely consuming Starlink's $4.423 billion operating profit and producing a combined SpaceX net loss of $4.937 billion. These figures had been disclosed in the S-1 filing before the IPO. The market had known them on June 12. But knowing something abstractly and confronting it through the lens of a $20 billion bond announcement are different psychological experiences, and the Monday session demonstrated that distinction with brutal clarity.
The second catalyst for the June 22 crash was the debut of options trading on SPCX. On June 17, the first week of SPCX options trading opened, allowing investors to buy puts — bets that the stock would fall — and allowing short sellers to hedge and build short positions for the first time. Prior to options, the thin public float made shorting SPCX practically impossible. There were too few shares available to borrow, making the cost of maintaining a short position prohibitive. Options changed that entirely. Short sellers who had been watching SPCX trade at 104.7 times price-to-sales — a multiple that dwarfs Nvidia at 35 times, Microsoft at 12 times, and Amazon at three times — and who believed the valuation reflected narrative rather than fundamental economics suddenly had the practical tools to express that view. The combination of the bond news and options-enabled shorting on a stock with a four-per-cent public float produced a seventeen per cent single-day decline.
Over the following two sessions, selling continued. By Tuesday, June 23, SpaceX shares dipped to $146.88 intraday — below the $150 opening price on IPO day — before recovering to close around $151. By June 24, the Bloomberg Billionaires Index placed Musk's total net worth at $957 billion, reflecting SpaceX trading at approximately $158.65 per share, a thirty-one per cent decline from the June 16 all-time high. A sixteen per cent single-day plunge on June 22 alone had erased approximately $240 billion from his fortune. Tesla's concurrent decline — the electric vehicle company fell an additional 5.8 per cent on June 23 as part of a broader technology sector rout — added further pressure. The Nasdaq 100 fell 2.1 per cent in the week to June 23. The S&P 500 fell 1.9 per cent. Alphabet shed 2.1 per cent. Amazon fell 0.9 per cent. Nvidia lost 2.7 per cent. Apple was 0.9 per cent lower. The SpaceX selloff was both driving and reflecting a broader technology sector correction, with the most overvalued name in the most overvalued sector bearing the largest share of the correction.
The Structural Reality Behind the Numbers
The conversation about whether SpaceX is overvalued at its current price is one that serious analysts have been having since the IPO was announced, and the June selloff has not resolved it.
Morningstar's fair value estimate for SpaceX stands at $62 per share — which, at the $158.65 June 24 closing price, implies a fifty-nine per cent premium to intrinsic value even after the crash. At the June 16 peak of $225.64, Morningstar's implied overvaluation was two hundred and sixty-four per cent. The bear case analysts make is grounded in straightforward fundamentals: SpaceX trades at 104.7 times price-to-sales with a negative forty-five per cent profit margin, has an accumulated deficit of $41.3 billion, and S&P projects negative free cash flow through 2029. Morningstar's analyst Nicholas Owens has placed the company's most optimistic plausible scenario — the moonshot case requiring both reliable commercial Starship reuse and successful orbital data centres simultaneously — at $197 per share with a seven per cent probability.
The bull case, articulated most forcefully by Goldman Sachs with a $310 per share target, rests entirely on the AI division. Goldman projects xAI revenue growing from approximately $3.2 billion today to $322 billion by 2030 — a hundredfold increase in four years. That projection does the majority of the work in any justification of the $1.77 trillion IPO valuation, and it requires believing that the $26.5 trillion addressable market SpaceX claimed in its prospectus is achievable at a meaningful fraction.
The structural headwinds that complicate the bull case are significant. All eleven of xAI's original co-founders departed the company in the months preceding the IPO — a fact that received relatively little coverage at the time but which, as TradingKey analyst Phil Huang noted, is very significant for a company whose valuation rests almost entirely on the promise of its AI capabilities. Musk himself told a March 2026 gathering that xAI was not built right first time around — an admission that, in the context of a $1.77 trillion valuation, raises questions about the execution capacity of the AI unit that forms the majority of that value. The xAI unit's third-party computing contracts — including agreements with Anthropic, Google, and ReflectionAI totalling approximately $75 billion according to Moody's — suggest genuine commercial traction. But the distance between those contracts and the $322 billion Goldman projects by 2030 is vast.
The lockup structure adds another layer of structural concern. Only four to five per cent of SPCX shares are in the public float. The staggered insider unlock schedule begins with up to twenty per cent of eligible insider shares after Q2 2026 earnings — expected in late July or early August. The standard 180-day lockup expires on December 8, 2026. Musk's approximately 6.4 billion personal shares do not unlock until June 2027. When ninety-five per cent of a stock's shares are locked up, the market price is set by the behaviour of the four to five per cent that trades. As each wave of insider unlocks arrives, the ratio of tradeable to non-tradeable shares changes, and the price discovery mechanism changes with it. The December 2026 unlock in particular — when the standard 180-day lockup expires and a large wave of insider shares theoretically becomes sellable — represents the most significant structural test the stock will face in its first year of public life.
What This Means Beyond Musk's Personal Fortune
The SpaceX selloff carries implications that extend well beyond the question of whether Musk is a trillionaire or merely a $957 billionaire.
SpaceX was the first of three mega-cap technology IPOs expected in 2026. Both Anthropic and OpenAI filed confidential S-1 registration statements in early June. The timing of their public debuts depends meaningfully on whether SPCX can hold its IPO price, because a failed or dramatically declining SpaceX IPO reduces institutional appetite for subsequent high-multiple technology offerings and forces underwriters to lower valuations and offer deeper discounts. The Kalshi prediction market prices Anthropic at seventy-two per cent likely to IPO before OpenAI. Both companies are watching SPCX's daily price movement closely. If the most hyped public debut in financial history cannot sustain its offering price, the $965 billion Anthropic valuation and the $852 billion OpenAI valuation face uncomfortable questions from the same institutional investors who bought SPCX and are now watching it trade below its opening day price.
Beyond the IPO pipeline, the SpaceX selloff sits within a broader technology sector correction driven by concerns that are both SpaceX-specific and macro in nature. The tighter monetary policy environment under Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh — who has signalled less willingness to cut rates in the context of a resilient economy — is weighing on rate-sensitive technology stocks whose valuations depend heavily on discounted future cash flows. A higher discount rate mathematically reduces the present value of cash flows that are projected a decade or more in the future, which is precisely the valuation structure that supports SpaceX, Anthropic, and other companies whose commercial promise is measured on a ten-to-twenty-year horizon.
The Scoreboard: Still Incomprehensibly Ahead
In the coverage of Musk's departure from trillionaire status, it is worth pausing to contextualise what $957 billion actually means in the hierarchy of global wealth.
Larry Page, the second wealthiest person on earth, is worth approximately $297 billion. The gap between Musk at $957 billion and Page at $297 billion is $660 billion — more than twice Jeff Bezos's entire net worth. Mark Zuckerberg sits at approximately $262 billion according to the Bloomberg index. The prediction market Kalshi has Zuckerberg as the next most likely person to achieve trillionaire status — but he would need to multiply his current net worth by approximately five times to do so. The $338 billion Musk has added to his fortune in 2026 alone — even after the selloff — exceeds the total wealth of the second-richest person on the planet.
Musk's brief twelve-day trillionaire status and subsequent return to billionaire status is a story about the extraordinary volatility of paper wealth concentrated in illiquid equity stakes in companies whose valuations are themselves speculative and narrative-driven. His $957 billion is, overwhelmingly, a number that exists on spreadsheets at Bloomberg and Forbes rather than in a bank account. His SpaceX stake — approximately $744 billion as of June 24, representing close to eighty per cent of his total fortune — is locked up and legally unsellable until at least late 2027. His ability to actualise that wealth in cash depends on future stock prices, future earnings, future regulatory environments, and the future behaviour of investors whose enthusiasm for SpaceX has already demonstrated its capacity for violent reversal.
Whether he retakes the trillion dollar mark — or whether the first human trillionaire was also the briefest human trillionaire — will depend primarily on whether SpaceX can hold its IPO price, deliver credible Q2 earnings in August, manage the December 2026 lockup expiry without catastrophic insider selling, and begin demonstrating a path to profitability that closes the enormous gap between what the stock trades at and what independent analysts believe it is worth.
What is certain is that the financial history of 2026 will record two facts about June. The first: Elon Musk became the world's first trillionaire. The second: he was not one for long. The interval between those two facts — twelve days — is perhaps the most extraordinary footnote in the history of personal wealth.
Note: this article reflects market data and analyst commentary as of June 24, 2026 and does not constitute investment advice. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult a qualified financial adviser before making investment decisions.
Sources
Entrepreneur — Elon Musk Isn't a Trillionaire Anymore As SpaceX Shares Drop (June 24, 2026): https://www.entrepreneur.com/business-news/elon-musk-isnt-a-trillionaire-anymore-spacex
Yahoo Finance — Elon Musk loses trillionaire status as SpaceX stock falls: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/elon-musk-loses-trillionaire-status-114356633.html
BeInCrypto — SpaceX Came Back to Earth — and Took Elon Musk's Trillionaire Status With It: https://beincrypto.com/spacex-stock-drop-musk-net-worth-below-trillion/
TradingKey — SpaceX (SPCX) Falls 31% From Its High — Why $100B in Cash Isn't Stopping the Selloff: https://www.tradingkey.com/analysis/stocks/us-stocks/261984118-spacex-stock-spcx-falls-31-percent-20-billion-bond-offering-tradingkey
Yahoo Finance — SpaceX stock tumbles 16.4%, shaving off most IPO gains since debut: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/article/spacex-stock-tumbles-164-shaving-off-most-ipo-gains-since-debut-141725657.html
Reuters / Virginia Business — SpaceX extends losses after $600 billion wipeout, tech stocks slide again (June 23, 2026): https://virginiabusiness.com/spacex-shares-fall-600-billion-tech-selloff/
MoneyWeek — SpaceX leads tech selloff: why have shares fallen?: https://moneyweek.com/investments/tech-stocks/spacex-leads-tech-selloff
TradingKey — SPCX Shares Fall for Third Straight Day. SpaceX Issues Debut Bond, Sparks Market Panic: https://www.tradingkey.com/analysis/stocks/us-stocks/261981729-stock-spacex-spcx-elon-musk-xai-gork-cursor-orcl-tradingkey
WEEX Wiki — Why Is SpaceX Stock Dropping? 5 Forces Behind the SPCX Pullback: https://www.weex.com/wiki/article/why-is-spacex-stock-dropping-5-forces-behind-the-spcx-pullback-ie00kh7yif0slpwv4iwrw5cw
BitMEX — SpaceX Stock Selloff: Why SPCX Crashed 31% and What Traders Should Watch: https://www.bitmex.com/blog/spacex-stock-selloff
Al Jazeera — Elon Musk poised to make history as world's first trillionaire (June 12, 2026): https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/6/12/elon-musk-poised-to-make-history-as-worlds-first-trillionaire
CNN Politics — SpaceX IPO: Musk's fortune, record raise, and what comes next (June 12, 2026): https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/20/spacex-ipo-live-updates.html